1. I reviewed the rule of three for writing an E.Q.
2.
a. Yes, this E.Q. meets the rule of three. It is not a yes or no question, but requires significant reflective thought upon the individual answering the question to narrow down all of the possible answers to just one.
b. Yes, this E.Q. meets the rule of three. It has very formal wording which is a great thing. It also is a very broad question that could mean a few different things which makes it all the more intriguing.
c. No, I do not feel like this meets the rule of three. Although it is very close, the word "satisfies" makes me feel like the difference in opinion from responders could create some definite friction with the presentation.
d. Yes, this meets the rule of three. I found the wording simple and direct, yet still open to many answers because the person is pertaining to a specific type of pain.
3. What is the most significant factor in making a client feel confident you will win their immigration case?
No comments:
Post a Comment